Conscientious objectors | RBS Remembers

RBS remembers

Conscientious objectors

Letter from a Christadelphian man who worked for London County & Westminster Bank, asking whether his work at the bank qualified for the 'national importance' category under which he could be exempted from military service. The letter has been annotated 'refuse', and this man later left the bank to work in forestry. © The National Archives (ref: MH 47/13/35)


Men who refused to participate in the war effort on conscientious grounds – for example, because of pacifist beliefs – were known as conscientious objectors. In more recent decades, public opinion has grown more sympathetic to their position, but at the time, there was a strong view that their stance was a threat to the whole war effort, and deeply unfair to those who were doing their bit. Conscientious objectors met with widespread disapproval, and few people – including their employers – wanted to be associated with them.

In January 1916, for example, National Provincial Bank’s chairman told the bank’s AGM audience that of over 1,700 employees of military age, only 24 had not yet attested (that is, declared themselves willing) for military service. Those 24, he said, ‘either have good reason no doubt for not doing so, or possibly they may be conscientious objectors!’


Any clerks who from conscientious or other motives decline to serve their country as combatants shall be considered as having thereby severed their connection with the bank

Williams Deacon's Bank board resolution, 4 May 1916


Dismissive remarks of this kind were not the worst trial faced by conscientious objectors. Several banks made it a matter of policy to end their employment. Others were a little less severe. London County & Westminster Bank, for example, did not dismiss men at the time of their declaration of a conscientious objection, but did require them to resign when they were called away to work on the land as part of the terms of their exemption from combat. They were not entitled to the part-pay that staff on military service received, and were given no guarantee of reinstatement after the war, although the bank agreed that it would consider their cases when the time came.

A minority of conscientious objectors refused any kind of labour, including farm work and other non-combatant roles, that could be said to be supporting the war. In their cases, the bank was more rigid. Immediately upon refusing, they were expected to resign from the bank.

Manchester & County Bank also kept conscientious objectors on its staff until they were called away for other war service. In at least one case, the bank chose to view a man as being away on ‘military service’, even though he was serving with a civilian ambulance unit as part of the terms of his exemption. He was welcomed back to the bank after the war, and – for the bank’s part – nothing more was said about his having been a conscientious objector. 


What's your view?

Please share your view or story on this subject for publication on this page.

You should ensure that you agree to our posting guidelines and then leave your comment, with What's your view as the email subject and the way you would like your name to appear with your message.

Please note that we review every comment before publishing it to make sure that it doesn't breach our posting guidelines so it sometimes takes a day or two for your comments to appear.

Leave your comment

Related topics

Temporary staff

Banks relied on temporary staff, including retired bankers, teenaged boys and women.

Tribunals and beyond

Tribunals dealt with requests to retain indispensable employees.

The Derby Scheme

Before conscription came in, there was one last attempt to recruit volunteers.

Set Tab for lightbox